Says one pundit: "Romney’s struggles in 2012 flowed from his
defensiveness and his fear of alienating Tea Party conservatives he
didn’t truly understand. When Romney was himself, as he was during his
first debate with the president, he seemed solid and self-assured. If
Romney did indeed decide to run again, he’d be wise to jettison his old
playbook and to instead detail how he, as a practitioner of creative
destruction and disruptive innovation and all the rest, can help make
these powerful economic forces work for all Americans. He could build a
new presidential campaign around the need to reform and renew America’s
safety net, to make it fiscally sustainable while also making it more
effective. Imagine if Romney, having been caricatured as a cat’s-paw of
the Wall Street overclass, decided to rail against the outsize power of
the megabanks and in favor of a more competitive and inclusive
capitalism. If we let Romney be Romney, we might find the populist the
party needs."
Read Slate, Romney 2016!
The problem is, of course, the so-called Tea Party would never go for it.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment