Thursday, September 15, 2011

More on the Republi-CON War on the Middle Class

UPDATE: "Another 2.6 million people slipped into poverty in the United States last year, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday, and the number of Americans living below the official poverty line, 46.2 million people, was the highest number in the 52 years the bureau has been publishing figures on it.

And in new signs of distress among the middle class, median household incomes fell last year to levels last seen in 1996.

Economists pointed to a telling statistic: It was the first time since the Great Depression that median household income, adjusted for inflation, had not risen over such a long period, said Lawrence Katz, an economics professor at Harvard."

Read The New York Times, Soaring Poverty Casts Spotlight on 'Lost Decade'.

But it has not been a lost decade for one group, seniors. From The New York Times, Poor Are Still Getting Poorer, but Downturn’s Punch Varies, Census Data Show:



"When so much income goes to the top, the middle class doesn’t have enough purchasing power to keep the economy going without sinking ever more deeply into debt — which, as we’ve seen, ends badly. An economy so dependent on the spending of a few is also prone to great booms and busts. The rich splurge and speculate when their savings are doing well. But when the values of their assets tumble, they pull back. That can lead to wild gyrations. Sound familiar?" Read The New York Times, The Limping Middle Class, which includes this graph:



As the Republi-CONs continue their war on the middle class, the American dream withers.

More Republi-CON Deficit and Debt Hypocrisy

UPDATE: Republi-cons voted to raise the debt limit before they voted against it. Read the Washington Post, Republicans’ underhanded serve.

Another instance of demanding pay-as-you-go spending from 'the other guy,' after being "against pay-as-you-go, for both disaster relief and mega-expensive wars, as long as a Republican was in the White House." Read The New York Times, Cantor, Irene, and Interest Rates.

Hello Globalization, Goodbye Jobs

"From 1951 through 2007, there were never more than three unemployed workers for each job opening, and it was rare for that figure even to hit two-to-one. In contrast, there have been more than three jobseekers per opening in every single month since September 2008. The ratio peaked somewhere between five-to-one and seven-to-one in mid-2009. It has since declined but we have far to go before we return to “normal” levels.

The bleak outlook for jobseekers has three immediate sources. The sharp deterioration beginning in early 2007 is the most dramatic feature of the above chart (the rise in job scarcity after point C in the chart, the steepness of which depends on the data source used). But two less obvious factors predated the recession. The first is the steepness of the rise in job scarcity during the previous recession in 2001 (from point A to point B), which rivaled that during the deep downturn of the early 1980s. The second is the failure between 2003 and 2007 of jobs per jobseeker to recover from the 2001 recession (the failure of point C to fall back to point A)."

Read Brookings, A Decade of Slack Labor Markets, which includes these graphs:





And why the anemic job market? It's China, stupid.

The Republi-con's economic no recovery plan, as they lobby for more tax cuts: destroy jobs and pay workers less.

As I said in February 2009, tax cuts are not the answer, this downturn won't be over 'til the fat lady gets a job.

The Republi-CON 'Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme' Myth

UPDATE II: "NO PONZI scheme in the history of the world has ever lasted 75 years. Ponzi schemes depend on garnering an ever-increasing pool of new investors to pay out returns to prior investors. When the potential pool of new investors runs dry, they collapse. This will occur when the scheme runs up against the natural limits of its recruitment strategy; in the ultimate case, it can't keep going past the point where the entire population is already subscribed.

This should provide us with a hint as to why . . . Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme. The entire population of working Americans has already been subscribed to Social Security for decades, yet the system continues to pay out benefits on time. That is because the actuarial calculations underlying its revenues and benefits are sound.

Read The Economist, Social Security, A monstrous truth.


UPDATE: "All this talk about it being a 'monstrous lie' or 'a Ponzi scheme' or 'broken' is meant to create a crisis to clear the way for radical changes in Social Security. But if folks want to make radical changes to Social Security, they should just make the argument for their proposed fixes. And good luck to them. But in reality, what’s going to happen is that sometime in the next decade or so, Republicans and Democrats are going to compromise on a package that adjusts Social Security by about 0.7 percent of GDP over the next 75 years." Read the Washington Post, The boring truth about Social Security.

From the Mother Jones, A Venn Diagram for Rick Perry: Social Security Is Not a Ponzi Scheme:

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Beware Federal Pensioners, Your Day of Reckoning is Coming

UPDATE: Bye, bye to more government pensions.

On Tuesday, Hollywood, FL, residents votes "to strip police, firefighters and the city’s general employee’s of their current pension plans, allowing the city to save $8.5 million." Read the Miami Herald, Hollywood voters: Cut the pensions.

As the Republi-CONs continue their war on the middle class, the American dream withers.

"Even as officials in Washington pledged to cut domestic spending [with no tax increases] . . . [several] American cities [serve an examples] . . . that no amount of belt tightening can set things right." Read The New York Times, Small City, Big Debt Problems, which cites "Prichard, Ala., a city you may have read about in the news, which defaulted on its obligations and simply stopped making pension payments to its retirees."

Republi-CON 'Less Government' Hypocrisy

UPDATE II: "A 16-month federal investigation has concluded that BP’s efforts to limit costs on its mile-deep Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico contributed to the disastrous blowout last year that killed 11 workers and sunk the giant rig Deepwater Horizon." Read the Washington Post, BP’s cost cuts contributed to oil spill disaster, federal probe finds.

Spill, baby, spill.


UPDATE: Speaking of hypocrisy, isn't funny that politicians now want to abandon liability limits for their friends in the oil industry. Read the Houston Chronicle, Lawmakers work to raise lid on BP's liability.

From the Washington Post, Through oil-fouled water, big government looks better and better:

"About an hour later came word from the Pentagon that Alabama, Florida and Mississippi -- all three governed by men who once considered themselves limited-government conservatives -- want the federal government to mobilize (at taxpayer expense, of course) more National Guard troops to aid in the cleanup.

That followed an earlier request by the small-government governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal (R), who issued a statement saying he had called the Obama administration 'to outline the state's needs' and to ask 'for additional resources.' Said Jindal: 'These resources are critical.'

About the time that Alabama, Florida and Mississippi were asking for more federal help, three small-government Republican senators, Richard Shelby and Jeff Sessions of Alabama and George LeMieux of Florida, were flying over the gulf on a U.S. government aircraft with small-government Republican Rep. Jeff Miller (Fla.). . .

It may have taken an ecological disaster, but the gulf-state conservatives' newfound respect for the powers and purse of the federal government is a timely reminder for them. As conservatives in Washington complain about excessive federal spending, the ones who would suffer the most from spending cuts are their own constituents.

An analysis of data from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation by Washington Post database specialist Dan Keating found that people in states that voted Republican were by far the biggest beneficiaries of federal spending. In states that voted strongly Republican, people received an average of $1.50 back from the federal government for every dollar they paid in federal taxes. In moderately Republican states, the amount was $1.19. In moderately Democratic states, people received on average of 99 cents in federal funds for each dollar they paid in taxes. In strongly Democratic states, people got back just 86 cents on the tax dollar.

If Sessions and Shelby succeed in shrinking government, their constituents in Alabama will be some of the biggest losers: They get $1.66 in federal benefits for every $1 they pay in taxes. If Louisiana's Vitter succeeds in shrinking government, his constituents will lose some of the $1.78 in federal benefits they receive for every dollar in taxes they pay. In Mississippi, it's $2.02.

That may explain why, as the oil slick hits the Gulf Coast, lawmakers from the region are willing to swallow their limited-government principles as they dangle federal aid before their constituents.

Nothing like a little oil spill to expose the Republi-con 'Less Government' hypocrisy.

Next up, all the Republi-con conspiracy theories on the cause of the oil spill.

Monday, September 12, 2011

Ten Years Later

UPDATE V: Did Republi-cons exploit 9/11 for political gain? You be the judge, read the Washington Post, About that Paul Krugman allegation of 9/11 shame.


UPDATE IV: "The legacy of 9/11 can’t be fully measured even now, but perhaps the most damaging aspect can be found in our national discourse.

Taking the long view, it is possible to see the roots of today’s political dysfunction — the hate, fear, anger and resentment — firmly planted in the soil at Ground Zero.

Did Osama bin Laden envision such a thing when he plotted the attacks? Probably not. He might have imagined that we would retaliate, and this would cost us lives and treasure. But he couldn’t have known that we eventually would lose our common sense of who we are. This has been the big surprise of 9/11 — an ongoing, self-perpetuating act of American self-destruction.

Something was unleashed 10 years ago that bears our scrutiny. It wasn’t only evil, though the attacks were certainly that. The event was so cataclysmic and horrifying that it caused a sort of emotional breakdown in the American constitution. Simply put, it damaged our collective soul and seems to have released a free-ranging hysteria that has contaminated our interactions ever since. . .

[S]urvival ultimately depends on our willingness to marshal reason and restraint against the emotional terrorism that surely will bring us down."

Read the Washington Post, An America that no longer knows itself.


UPDATE III: Something for our resident Pastor-to-the-Dictators, who defends hundreds of killings, arrests and torture cases by Middle East dictators, to think about, from the New York Times, And Hate Begat Hate:

"IN their shock after Sept. 11, 2001, Americans frequently asked, 'Why do they hate us so much?' It wasn’t clear just who 'they' were — Muslims, Arabs or simply anyone who was not American. The easy answer that many Americans found comforting was equally vague: that 'they' were jealous of America’s wealth, opportunities, democracy and what have you.

But in this part of the world — in Pakistan, where I live, and in Afghanistan next door, from which the Sept. 11 attacks were directed — those who detested America were much more identifiable, and so were their reasons. They were a small group of Islamic extremists who supported Al Qaeda; a larger group of students studying at madrasas, which had expanded rapidly since the 1980s; and young militants who had been empowered by years of support from Pakistan’s military intelligence services to fight against India in Kashmir. They were a tiny minority of Pakistan’s 150 million people at the time. In their eyes, America was an imperial, oppressive, heathen power just like the Soviet Union, which they had defeated in Afghanistan.

Now, with the United States about to enter the 11th year of the longest war it has ever fought, far more of my neighbors in Pakistan have joined the list of America’s detractors."

UPDATE II: "What if the United States' response to the Sept. 11 attacks was a politics of forgiveness and peace?" Read The New York Times, The Cycle of Revenge, which note that:

"In the New Testament, Peter asks Jesus about the quantity of forgiveness: How many times should we forgive someone who had sinned against him. Is seven times enough, he wonders out loud? To which Jesus replies, from his full messianic height, 'No, not seven times, but seventy times seven,' meaning, there is no quantity to forgiveness, just an infinite quality."


UPDATE: "The war our enemies began on Sept. 11, 2001, is long over. Perhaps now, after 10 years of anxiety and self-doubt, we can acknowledge our victory and begin the postwar renewal and reconciliation that the nation so desperately needs.

There never was a 'war on terrorism.' It wasn’t 'terrorism' that crashed airliners into buildings on that brilliant Tuesday morning. The attacks were carried out by a 19-member assault team from al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization then being sheltered by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. There most definitely was a war against al-Qaeda, and we won."

Read the Washington Post, Post-9/11 permanent state of war should have ended long ago.
Link
A topic for discussion today: 9/11, ten years later, what do you remember of that day, and what lessons have we learned, the cost of 9/11, one estimate is $3.3 trillion, and lost chances and those persistent myths about the attacks

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Class Today at NoBullU on WEBY

Listen to the voice of wisdom and reason in a wilderness of partisan rhetoric -- No political insanity, no conservative hypocrisy, no liberal foolishness -- Just straight talk, straight at you, and that’s no bull!!

NoBullU will broadcast today from 4:05 to 6:00 p.m. at 1330 AM WEBY and on line.

Topics:

Local Business/Event Shout-Out: 3rd Annual Pensacola Beach Songwriters Festival, Featuring 80+ Songwriters, 18 Stages, 200+ Performances!, September 28 through October 3, 2011, also on Facebook


Follow-up: TBD


Fact-free fantasies of the shrieking hatemongers of right-wing rhetoric and partisan hackery: don't be duped by the Birthers, including our very own Pastor Dred Scott (you may remember the infamous Dred Scott decision of 1857, which asserted that African Americans were "beings of an inferior order" who "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." That ruling declared that African Americans could never be U.S. citizens and therefore could never be President),

See The Fogbow, "your best resource for debunking the lies of the 'birther' movement and discussing the birther antics" and WhatsYourEvidence.com, there is even a Birther Case Scorecard, 0-80 for the birthers

and

I heard our resident Pastor-to-the-Dictators supporting Middle East dictators again. I wonder how he can call himself a Christian but defend "hundreds of killings, arrests and torture cases by Middle East dictators;

Dale Perkins unsuccessfully asked several times congressional investigation of the fisheries management, perpetuating the Republi-CON 'taxes and regulations are killing business' myth, and his prior questionable judgment,


Local and regional: another article explaining the incestuous relationships, more good ol’ boy shenanigans in Podunk-cola, TEAM Santa Rosa wants more money, can someone tell me how many jobs it brought to the county, and God and local government;


National and international: 9/11, ten years later, what do you remember of that day, and what lessons have we learned, the cost of 9/11, one estimate is $3.3 trillion, and lost chances and those persistent myths about the attacks

I'm waiting, where's the balanced budget, don't hold you breath because the Republi-CONs Con the Tea Party, there'll be no $100 billion budget cut, and let's admit the obvious, the Republi-CONs are not serious about deficits, and who's responsible for the debt

To balance the budget, do nothing

Was 'Karl Marx right

Told ya so: economic stimulus

It's China, stupid

Be Very Very Afraid of 'The Invisible [Republi-CON] Bond Vigilantes'

The Republi-CON stimulus myth

The myth of expansionary austerity

Let's play the Republi-CON game of 'spot the contradiction', can you explain the Republi-CON contradiction as regards the economy, the debt ceiling, or deficits, or national security, or health care costs, or or even jobs

Republi-CON tax hypocrisy

More Republi-CON deficit and debt hypocrisy

More on the Republi-CON war on the middle class

The Great Stagnation' and our broken political system;


What Next in Libya?

Is Palestinian terrorism 'justified'?


May you live in interesting times


150 years later


And the Republi-CON Race is On, to find America’s Not-Mitt, time will tell if Perry's the Not-Mitt but, "under the traditional rules of American politics, last night was a very bad night for" Perry

Rick Perry, R-Murderer and Believer of Junk Science

Bachmann says the earth quake and hurrican were sign from God, do you agree

Still searching for the ideal Republican candidate: conservative, interested, electable

Miller's in good company, Perry, a former West Texas cotton farmer, [who] received at least $83,000 in federal farm subsidies between 1987 and 1998, during the time he was in elected office, according to his tax returns

The Republi-CON 'social security is a ponzi scheme' myth and The Republi-CON I'd be a millionaire if it wasn't for social security myth


2 to 1 in the COA, health care lawsuit update

The health care industry bottomline, the reason Republi-CON want to repeal the new health care law


The Republi-CON 'Climategate' myth

and

Big brother is watching you,


Fun stuff: If you want . . . adopt a dog, riddle of the day, and recession humor

Twelve things that a motorcycle can teach, and cute little cats in 'It Could Be Worse';

and

Donate to a good cause: read "the story of a 9-year-old girl who teaches us adults about maturity truly renews our faith in humanity" at The New York Times, Rachel’s Last Fund-Raiser.

I'll discuss anything, but expect a no mercy take down if you are a shrieking hatemonger of right-wing rhetoric and partisan hackery, pandering to fear, anger and hatred, because the truth sure makes it hard out there for the party pimps.

So tune-in, call-in, but only if you can handle the truth and some ass kickin' discussion of politics and current events.

And the Republi-CON Race is On

UPDATE V: "The race is on in the Republican Party to find America’s Not-Mitt." Read The New York Times, Debating With the Stars.

Time will tell if Perry's the Not-Mitt but:

"Under the traditional rules of American politics, last night was a very bad night for Texas Governor Rick Perry. In his debut debate, his first introduction to a national audience, he found himself first explaining and then doubling down on his description of Social Security as a 'Ponzi scheme,' with a few references to the 'monstrous lie' of its long-term promises thrown in for good measure. It was precisely the kind of moment that the Romney campaign must have been hoping for, and thanks to the moderators’ questions and Perry’s answers, it fell into Romney’s lap without him having to even raise the issue. As soon as the exchange happened, a Romney adviser e-mailed Politico’s Ben Smith: '[Perry] has lost. No federal candidate has ever won on the Perry program to kill Social Security. Never has. never will.' That’s spin, yes, but I’m sure the Romney people believe the basic premise. As well they should. Everything we know about American voters — and yes, Republican primary voters very much included — suggests that Perry’s comments will eventually be deadly to his electoral prospects. . .

Based on last night’s performance, Rick Perry intends to run as exactly the kind of presidential candidate that many leading conservatives insist that the country wants and needs. In four months time, we’ll begin to find out if they’re right."

Read The New York Times, The Rick Perry Experiment.

Are the Republi-cons still searching for Mr. Right but Electable?

Also, read the Republi-CON 'social security is a ponzi scheme' myth


UPDATE IV: Tammy want to know why is Ron Paul like the 13th floor, often omitted?

"Even when the media does remember Ron Paul, it's only to reassure themselves that there's no need to remember Ron Paul." Watch The Daily Show, Indecision 2012 - Corn Polled Edition - Ron Paul & the Top Tier:



UPDATE III: Was the Iowa straw poll a 'GOP ideological purity test'? And if so, was Obama the winner? Read the Washington Post, Tim Pawlenty and the limits of ideological purity and The straw poll winner: Barack Obama.


UPDATE II: Speaking of the "nonsense of the Iowa straw poll", read Rick's Blog, Iowa Caucus: You have to be kidding.


UPDATE: "The nonsense of the Iowa straw poll is behind us. We’ve had another GOP debate. We have one more candidate (Rick Perry) and one less (Tim Pawlenty). [Read] some thoughts as the nomination contest actually gets going" at Time, Notes on an Elephant in Despair.

"It will be the best of times for some GOP hopefuls and the worst of times for others.

Every candidate has a dream scenario for Saturday’s Ames Straw Poll but also a chance for a hard flop. For every George W. Bush, who won the nonbinding poll in 1999 and went on to win the caucuses as well, there is a Tommy Thompson, who dropped out of the GOP race in 2007, one day after finishing a disappointing sixth in Ames.

While it’s notoriously hard to game out the results of the presidential trial ballot that takes place on the grounds of Iowa State University, it’s a little easier to understand the best- and worst-case scenarios for each candidate.

[For] a quick guide to the prospective highs and lows for each of the roughly dozen GOP hopefuls when the ballots have been counted late Saturday afternoon," read Politico, Ames: Best and worst case scenarios.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

A Sign From God??

UPDATE: "In Michele Bachmann's metaphor, God represents the American people, politicians represent themselves, and the hurricane represents the earthquake." Watch the Colbert Report, Michele Bachmann's Natural Disaster Metaphor:


"Speaking this weekend in Florida, GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann had this to say about Hurricane Irene and the recent earthquake which shook the East Coast:

'I don’t know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians. We’ve had an earthquake; we’ve had a hurricane. He said, ‘Are you going to start listening to me here?’ Listen to the American people because the American people are roaring right now. They know government is on a morbid obesity diet and we’ve got to rein in the spending.'"


Read the Washington Post, Bachmann’s religious politics.

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Our Congressional Gang Members

Congress is "'not a collegial body anymore . . . It is more like gang behavior. Members walk into the chamber full of hatred. They believe the worst lies about the other side. Two senators stopped by my office just a few hours ago. Why? They had a plot to nail somebody on the other side. That’s what Congress has come to." So says a Blue Dog Democrat. Read The New York Times, The Last Moderate.

Friday, September 2, 2011

If You Want . . . Adopt a Dog

From an email:

If you want someone who will eat whatever you put in front of him and never say it's not quite as good as his mother's, then adopt a dog.

If you want someone always willing to go out, at any hour, for as long and wherever you want, then adopt a dog.

If you want someone who will never touch the remote, doesn't care about football, and can sit next to you as you watch romantic movies, then adopt a dog.

If you want someone who is content to get on your bed just to warm your feet and whom you can push off if he snores, then adopt a dog!

If you want someone who never criticizes what you do, doesn't care if you are pretty or ugly, fat or thin, young or old, who acts as if every word you say is especially worthy of listening to, and loves you unconditionally, perpetually, then adopt a dog.

BUT, on the other hand, if you want someone who will never come when you call, ignores you totally when you come home, leaves hair all over the place, walks all over you, runs around all night and only comes home to eat and sleep, and acts as if your entire existence is solely to ensure his happiness, then ..

See comments for the answer.

Riddle of the Day

From an email:

Arnold Schwarzenegger has a big one.
Michael J. Fox has a small one.
Madonna doesn't have one.
The Pope has one but doesn't use it.
Clinton uses his all the time.
Obama is one.
Mickey Mouse has an unusual one.
Liberace never used his on women..
Jerry Seinfeld is very, very proud of his.
Cher claims that she took on 3.
We never saw Lucy use Desi's.

What is it?

See comments for the answer.

The Republi-CON I'd Be a Millionaire If It Wasn't For Social Security Myth

UPDATE V: A repost after a rebroadcast of the original show.


UPDATE IV: "Attacking Social Security is cruel and unnecessary, and it has to stop." Read The New York Times, Raising False Alarm.


UPDATE III: "You can save all your life, but those last years before you retire will determine the result." Read The New York Times, With Retirement Savings, It’s a Sprint to the Finish.


UPDATE II: For "[a]nnualized returns for the S.& P. 500., for nearly 4,000 periods," see The New York Times, In Investing, It’s When You Start and When You Finish.


UPDATE: Still think private retirement accounts are the panacea? Read Time, Why It's Time to Retire the 401(k).

Yesterday our great Master Bates spend two hour perpetuating The Republi-CON "I'd Be a Millionaire If It Wasn't For Social Security" Myth. I tried to call in to challenge him on several points, but he wouldn't take my call. No surprise, because he doesn't want to acknowledge the following:


But if you want to touch the flame . . .

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Sub Today at NoBullU on WEBY

Usually on Thursdays you can listen to me, the voice of wisdom and reason in a wilderness of partisan rhetoric -- no political insanity, no conservative hypocrisy, no liberal foolishness -- just straight talk, straight at you, and that’s no bull!!

But I can't make it today. I'll be back next week to deprogram you.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

To Balance the Budget, Do Nothing

UPDATE II: "[T]here’s an uncomplicated way to fix America’s medium-term debt woes. All Congress has to do is … nothing. At the end of 2012, the Bush tax cuts would automatically lapse. As inflation rose, the alternative minimum tax would hit more and more Americans. A whole slew of business tax breaks would expire. And the Sustainable Growth Rate formula in Medicare would trigger large automatic cuts to payments to doctors." Read the Washington Post, Doing nothing is still an option, which includes this graph:




UPDATE: Another way to balance the budget, end tax expenditures, better known as tax deductions. Tax expenditures amounted to about $1 trillion in 2009. Read Random Observations for Students of Economics, Spending Hidden in the Tax Code.

One difference, "non-defense discretionary spending tends to be skewed quite progressively while tax expenditures are often quite regressive." In other words, the tax deductions like that for corporate jets disproportionally benefit the rich.

As I've said before, the NoBullU solution for the federal deficit and debt is: restructure the federal government (to end Congressional free lunchism), reform the federal tax code (so that revenues pay for ALL government spending), and amend the Constitution to require a balanced federal budget (because Congress can't control its spending).


"The single most important fact about our projected deficits is that if Congress does nothing, they go away. You might not like how they go away — it’s mostly higher taxes and sharp cuts to Medicare — but they go away." Read the Washington Post, We have a Congress problem, not a deficit problem, in one graph:

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Republi-CON Jeff Miller, R-Hypocrite-ville

UPDATE II: Shouldn't be long now until Miller endorses "Perry, a former West Texas cotton farmer, [who] received at least $83,000 in federal farm subsidies between 1987 and 1998, during the time he was in elected office, according to his tax returns."

For more instances of Perry hypocrisy, read The New York Times, As a States’ Rights Stalwart, Perry Draws Doubts.


UPDATE: "A town hall meeting at Marcus Pointe Baptist Church brought out at least 300 people, many of whom attacked U.S. Rep. Jeff Miller's vote to raise the debt ceiling." Read the Pensacola News Journal, Miller takes heat for debt deal.

From the Pensacola New Journal, Rep. Jeff Miller speaks out on the debt showdown:

"Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Chumuckla, said he voted for the Boehner proposal even though its spending cuts weren't as deep as an earlier version of debt-limit legislation because President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats aren't serious about cutting the debt."

Did Boehner's bill end farm subsidies for wealthy farmers?

I think it's a fair question because Republi-CON Jeff Miller's family, who collectively own thousands of acres in the local area, has received millions in farm subsidies. Even he collected some before he first ran for public office.

Just curious if CONgress Miller is trying to con us into believing he is a fiscal conservative.

May You Live in Interesting Times

"HOLD onto your hats and your wallets. Since the end of the cold war, the global system has been held together to a large degree by four critical ruling bargains. Today all four are coming unstuck at once and will need to be rebuilt. Whether and how that rebuilding happens — beginning in the U.S. — will determine a lot about what’s in your wallet and whether your hat flies off.

Now let me say that in English: the European Union is cracking up. The Arab world is cracking up. China’s growth model is under pressure and America’s credit-driven capitalist model has suffered a warning heart attack and needs a total rethink. Recasting any one of these alone would be huge. Doing all four at once — when the world has never been more interconnected — is mind-boggling. We are again 'present at the creation' — but of what?"

Read The New York Times, All Together Now.

What Next in Libya?

UPDATE X: "Libya, in the wake of this damage, was a risk for President Obama. There were many reasons for not intervening — a third war in a Muslim country was not what America needed and the homegrown quality of the Arab Spring has been central to its moral force. But to allow Muammar el-Qaddafi to commit a massacre foretold in Benghazi would have been unforgivable.

The intervention has been done right — with the legality of strong United Nations backing, full support from America’s European allies, and quiet arming of the rebels. The Libyan people have been freed from a crazed tyranny. Unlike in Iraq, burdens were shared: America flew the intelligence missions and did the refueling while the French, British, Dutch and others did most of the bombing."

Read The New York Times, Score One for Interventionism.


UPDATE IX: "It’s remarkable how reluctant Obama’s opponents are to acknowledge that despite all the predictions that his policy of limited engagement could never work, it actually did." Read the Washington Post, Obama can't win for winning in Libya.


UPDATE VIII: "The fall of Tripoli is a foreign policy triumph for which President Barack Obama won’t hold a ticker-tape parade: no flight suit, no chest-thumping, no 'Mission Accomplished' banner.

But the low-profile, inexpensive ouster of Col. Muammar Qadhafi marks an important milestone for the administration, foreign policy analysts say — perhaps the most concrete evidence that the more modest American foreign policy approach that has become Obama’s hallmark and perhaps his biggest area of contrast with his more interventionist predecessor might actually work."

Read Politico, Libya a victory for 'leading from behind'?


UPDATE VII: And how was it done? Read The New York Times, Surveillance and Coordination [and Training] With NATO Aided Rebels.


UPDATE VI: Mission accomplished in Libya? Read The New York Times, Mystery of Qaddafi’s Whereabouts Looms Large in Conflict’s Endgame.

I guess the Republi-cons will be for the war again, after they were against it, after they were for it.

It is also interesting to compare the efforts in Libya to Iraq.

And it reaffirms my support for an openly debated and conducted assassination policy for rogue dictators.


UPDATE V: "Despite a fumbled communication strategy, President Obama is actually taking a prudent course in trying to undermine Qaddafi." Read The New York Times, The Defection Track., which suggests:

"There are three plausible ways he might go, which inside the administration are sometimes known as the Three Ds. They are, in ascending order of likelihood: Defeat — the ragtag rebel army vanquishes his army on the battlefield; Departure — Qaddafi is persuaded to flee the country and move to a villa somewhere; and Defection — the people around Qaddafi decide there is no future hitching their wagon to his, and, as a result, the regime falls apart or is overthrown.

The result is a strategy you might call Squeeze and See."


UPDATE IV: "Libya is just the first of many hard choices we’re going to face in the 'new' Middle East." Read The New York Times, Looking for Luck in Libya, which included this observation:

"There is an old saying in the Middle East that a camel is a horse that was designed by a committee. That thought came to my mind as I listened to President Obama trying to explain the intervention of America and its allies in Libya — and I don’t say that as criticism. I say it with empathy. This is really hard stuff, and it’s just the beginning."

UPDATE III: Why are Republi-cons undermining U.S. military and foreign policy objectives, after year of incessant moral blackmail regarding Iraq?

The U.S. has the power to do something constructive, and Gaddafi is good reason to try it.

He
reaffirms my support for an openly debated and conducted assassination policy for rogue dictators.


UPDATE II: Damned when he didn't, and damned when he did, from the Washington Post:




UPDATE: "President Obama's bombing of Libya without congressional authorization or debate puts us on a dangerous path. A minimum standard for transparency in government is that the House and the Senate go on the record for or against a new war." Read the Christian Science Monitor, If Obama can bomb Libya, a President Palin can bomb Iran without Congress's OK.

"In the West’s preferred chain of events, airstrikes enable a democratic revolution. One expert expects the opposite." Read The New York Times, Hopes for a Qaddafi Exit, and Worries of What Comes Next.

Why? "[B]ecause there are two kinds of states in the Middle East: 'real countries' with long histories in their territory and strong national identities (Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Iran); and those that might be called 'tribes with flags,' or more artificial states with boundaries drawn in sharp straight lines by pens of colonial powers that have trapped inside their borders myriad tribes and sects who not only never volunteered to live together but have never fully melded into a unified family of citizens. They are Libya, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The tribes and sects that make up these more artificial states have long been held together by the iron fist of colonial powers, kings or military dictators. They have no real 'citizens' in the modern sense. Democratic rotations in power are impossible because each tribe lives by the motto 'rule or die' — either my tribe or sect is in power or we’re dead." Read The New York Times, Tribes With Flag.

Friday, August 26, 2011

Republi-CON Tax Hypocrisy

UPDATE II: "It is hard to find a tax cut that Congressional Republicans dislike. Unless it is a tax cut pushed by President Obama." Read The New York Times, For Some in G.O.P., a Tax Cut Not Worth Embracing.


UPDATE: "America’s presumably anti-tax party wants to raise your taxes. Come January, the Republicans plan to raise the taxes of anyone who earns $50,000 a year by $1,000, and anyone who makes $100,000 by $2,000." Read the Washington Post, The GOP will raise taxes — on the middle class and working poor.

"News flash: Congressional Republicans want to raise your taxes. Impossible, right? GOP lawmakers are so virulently anti-tax, surely they will fight to prevent a payroll tax increase on virtually every wage-earner starting Jan. 1, right?

Apparently not."

Read the Washington Post, GOP may OK tax increase that Obama hopes to block.

Why would Republi-CONs allow this?

It's election time!

'Karl Marx Was Right'

"There's an old axiom that goes, "wise is the person who appreciates candor almost as much as good news." With that as a guide, place the forthcoming decidedly in the category of candor.

Economist Nouriel 'Dr. Doom' Roubini, the New York University professor who four years ago accurately predicted the global financial crisis, said one of economist Karl Marx's critiques of capitalism is playing itself out in the current global financial crisis.

Marx, among other theories, argued that capitalism had an internal contradiction that would cyclically lead to crises, and that, at minimum, would place pressure on the economic system.

Companies, Roubini said, are motivated to minimize costs, to save and stockpile cash, but this leads to less money in the hands of employees, which means they have less money to spend and flow back to companies.

Now, in the current financial crisis, consumers, in addition to having less money to spend due to the above, are also motivated to minimize costs, to save and stockpile cash, magnifying the effect of less money flowing back to companies.

'Karl Marx had it right,' Roubini said in an interview with wsj.com. 'At some point capitalism can self-destroy itself. That's because you can not keep on shifting income from labor to capital without not having an excess capacity and a lack of aggregate demand. We thought that markets work. They are not working. What's individually rational ... is a self-destructive process.'

Roubini added absent organic, strong GDP growth -- which can increase wages and consumer spending -- what's needed is large fiscal stimulus, agreeing with another high-profile economist, Nobel Prize-winner Paul Krugman, that, in the case of the United States, the $786 billion fiscal stimulus approved by Congress in 2009 was too small to create the aggregate demand necessary to advance the U.S. economic recovery to a self-sustaining expansion.

Absent additional fiscal stimuli, or unexpected strong GDP growth, the only solution is a universal debt restructuring for banks, homes (essentially households/families) and governments, Roubini said. However, no such universal restructuring has occurred, he added.

Without that additional fiscal stimulus, that lack of restructuring has led to 'zombie houses, zombie banks and zombie governments,' he said."

Read the International Business Times, Nouriel 'Dr. Doom' Roubini: 'Karl Marx Was Right'.

But as discussed in the past, Republi-CON zombie ideas live on.

P.S. He also predicts that the global economic crisis will cause more social unrest and "absent a return to the right balance between markets and public goods, conditions are likely to get substantially worse. . .

The Tea Party, and other conservatives are, by-and-large, in addition to their opposition to more, short-term fiscal stimulus, also opposed to vital investments in human capital, skills, and the social safety net to increase productivity that enable workers to compete, be flexible, and thrive in a global economy."

Read the International Business Times, NYU's Nouriel 'Dr. Doom' Roubini-Social Unrest Will Spread.

Local Republi-Con Corruption Scandal?

UPDATE VIII: Another article explaining the incestuous relationships. Read the Northwest Florida Daily News, Local development interests connect people named in federal subpoenas.


UPDATE VII: The my poop don't stink defense.

"Santa Rosa County commissioners . . . expressed confidence that the county has nothing to fear from the FBI investigation that has ordered volumes of county documents surrounding land deals, travel and other issues over the last decade. The subpoenas seemed to focus on issues related to Navarre developer Bill Pullum, his sale of an industrial park to the county, and trips to his private island in Honduras." Read the Pensacola News Journal, Santa Rosa commissioners confident probe will find no wrong-doing by county.


UPDATE VI: More on the federal investigation of land deals, developer ties. Read the Pensacola News Journal, FBI probe widens to commission, TEAM Santa Rosa.


UPDATE V: One of the subpoenas also requests "[a]ny information regarding Mike Roger's appraisal of 90 acres owned by Bill Pullum to be sold the county." Read the Pensacola News Journal, Travel, land records sought in Santa Rosa probe.


UPDATE IV: My, my, the feds are investigating. About time don't ya think.

"Investigators with the U.S. Attorney's Office paid a visit to the Santa Rosa County Administrative complex Tuesday morning and served two subpoenas. . .

The U.S. Assistant Attorney requested a wide variety of documents dating back several years as part of a federal grand jury investigation.

Some of the items listed in the two subpoenas include any and all information, files, notes, memos, electronic communications, references, letters, correspondence, meeting munutes, and recordings relative to: . . .

Any present or past SRC Commissioner's travel to Honduras, Guanaja, and or Clark Cay, honduras with or at the request of Bill or Bart Pullum to include inforamtion on travelers imvolvement with the Honduran Government and any transacted business with or on behalf of Bill Pullum, Team Santa Rosa, any U.S. company, corporation and or Santa Rosa County. . .

Any SRC Commissioner's travel (personal or business) provided by Bill or Bart Pullum via aircraft (private or commercial) or vehicle since Jan. 2001."

Read the Santa Rosa Press Gazette, Federal investigators visit Santa Rosa County (subpoenas included).

I wonder if the feds will agree that a four day trip for two, in a private plane, to stay in a two-bedroom beach cabin on the private island of Clarks Cay, Guanaja, Honduras, is valued at $1,000.


UPDATE III: A follow-up for long-time listeners who remember this oldie but goodie:

[After more than two years, "t]he Florida Commission on Ethics has found probable cause to believe that former Santa Rosa County Commissioner Gordon Goodin violated ethics rules, but the commission plans no sanctions against Goodin.

Goodin 'failed to timely report as a gift a trip he received that was valued in excess of $100,' the commission announced in a news release today.

However, 'the commission found no probable cause to believe that the trip was intended to influence his vote on a purchase of property. No probable cause was also found concerning an allegation that the trip constituted a prohibited gift from a lobbyist of the county.' . .

In 2009, Goodin, a Navarre Republican, admitted that he had mistakenly failed to report a 2005 trip on which he and his wife, Jean, traveled with Navarre developer Bill Pullum to Guanaja, one of the Bay Islands of Honduras in the Caribbean Sea. The group ultimately traveled to Pullum's nearby private island, Clarkscay, and spent four days there.

He valued the trip at about $1,000."

Read the Pensacola New Journal, No sanction for ex-Commissioner Goodin.

You might remember that soon after this matter became public, I took reservation for these '$1,000' trips. And a commenter to this most recent story noted:

"His reasons for not reporting it make sense, though the value he associated with the trip show how crooked he is and how stupid he thinks the electorate is. Plane fare for two and 4 days on a private island is $1000.

Where can I make reservations?"

Should I dust off the reservation list?


UPDATE III: Some have come to the defense of a local businessman -- the island's owner, who took the county commissioner on a four day trip for two, in a private plane, to stay in a two-bedroom beach cabin on the private island of Clarks Cay, Guanaja, Honduras, before the business man sold the county, for $3,000,000, 90 acres of land appraised at one point to be worth $900,000 -- by reminding everyone people from a local church did mission work in Guanaja, Honduras.

I've reviewed the photos of three mission trips, and except for a few nails being hammered, it didn't appear that much of lasting value was accomplished on the trips to the "luxurious island get-away." (That is the businessman's description of the island, not mine.)

Some people spend a lot of money to fly to remote locations and talk, with the delusion that their effort justifies the expense. In foreign aid there was a term for these people, the Marriott Brigade. These people profited greatly from their so-called humanitarian efforts, but rarely had a lasting impact.

If you want to make a difference, and engage in a successful charitable effort that has a long term impact, then read The New York Times, Clean, Sexy Water, for an example.

But if the overall purpose of your trip is to talk with poor people in poor countries, then stay at a "luxurious island get-away," don't expect sympathy or understanding from me.

That said, read the Northwest Florida Daily News, Ex-county employee: 'This mess is so corrupt', for more on this developing story of possible local Republi-con corruption.


UPDATE II: Read the Pensacola New Journal, Forgive me for I have sinned and Northwest Florida Daily News, Complaints widening in Santa Rosa.

In a comment to the PNJ editorial, MrsDoubtfire wrote:

WEBY 1330 was running a sign up program for all citizens of SRC. Anyone wanting to sign up for a $1,000 five day vacation to a South Carribean island with private bungalo and food, fun, and surf provided could put their name on the list and be considered for selection by the Goodin Travel Agency. Quite a deal don't ya think?
7/11/2009 10:04:47 AM

Actually, it was a four day trip for two, in a private plane, to stay in a two-bedroom beach cabin on the private island of Clarks Cay, Guanaja, Honduras. No promises were made regarding food, fun, and surf, but we can work out the details later. And it is still quite a deal. Continue the sign up here by posting a comment.


UPDATE: Certain individuals who were the subject of much discussion today were none too pleased with the program. I won't repeat what they have said, but I make this offer. If Mike will let me, I'll host a two hour program with said certain individuals to discuss the issue(s) and allow them to clarify their positions, and I'll make a correction(s) to what I said if appropriate.

I always endeavor to be as accurate and truthful as possible. So if certain individuals want to continue the discussion, give me a call to arrange the show.

What is the value of a four day trip, in a private plane, to stay in a two-bedroom beach cabin on the private island of Clarks Cay, Guanaja, Honduras?

Need a little help, then visit the Clarks Cay website for a preview.

Better hurry cause a local politician forgot to report his free trip to the island before he voted to purchase of 90 acres of land from the island's owner earlier this year for $3 million and I'm thinking the owner's gonna pull the plug on the website soon. Why? Cause now that the trip has been made public, the politician would like you to believe the value of the trip was only $1,000. And after you preview the trip on the website I'm bettin that you will agree, the value of the trip was much higher.

And some in the community now claim the land the county purchased was not worth the money paid. It is déjà vu all over again just one county over. But instead of a collard greens pot with money, we have a swanky private island.

I'm predicting resignation and criminal prosecution on this one.

See these related articles: Pensacola New Journal, Goodin 'sorry' for omission and Northwest Florida Daily News, Commissioner's island trip: Ethics violation? (<-with photos the owner and politician can't hide).

Recession Humor

From and email:

The recession has hit everybody really hard...

My neighbor got a pre-declined credit card in the mail.

Wives are having sex with their husbands because they can't afford batteries.

CEO's are now playing miniature golf.

Exxon-Mobil laid off 25 Congressmen.

A stripper was killed when her audience showered her with rolls of pennies while she danced.

I saw a Mormon with only one wife.

If the bank returns your check marked "Insufficient Funds," you call them and ask if they meant you or them.

McDonald's is selling the 1/4 ouncer.

Angelina Jolie adopted a child from America.

Parents in Beverly Hills fired their nannies and learned their children's names.

My cousin had an exorcism but couldn't afford to pay for it, and they re-possessed her!

A truckload of Americans was caught sneaking into Mexico.

A picture is now only worth 200 words.

When Bill and Hillary travel together, they now have to share a room.

The Treasure Island casino in Las Vegas is now managed by Somali pirates.

And, finally....

I was so depressed last night thinking about the economy, wars, jobs, my savings, Social Security, retirement funds, etc., I called the Suicide Hotline. I got a call centre in Pakistan, and when I told them I was suicidal, they got all excited, and asked if I could drive a truck.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Class Today at NoBullU on WEBY

Listen to the voice of wisdom and reason in a wilderness of partisan rhetoric -- No political insanity, no conservative hypocrisy, no liberal foolishness -- Just straight talk, straight at you, and that’s no bull!!

NoBullU will broadcast today from 4:05 to 6:00 p.m. at 1330 AM WEBY and on line.

Topics:

Local Business/Event Shout-Out: 3rd Annual Pensacola Beach Songwriters Festival, Featuring 80+ Songwriters, 18 Stages, 200+ Performances!, September 28 through October 3, 2011, also on Facebook


Follow-up: TBD


Fact-free fantasies of the shrieking hatemongers of right-wing rhetoric and partisan hackery: don't be duped by the Birthers, including our very own Pastor Dred Scott (you may remember the infamous Dred Scott decision of 1857, which asserted that African Americans were "beings of an inferior order" who "had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." That ruling declared that African Americans could never be U.S. citizens and therefore could never be President), and

Church support for slavery and opposition to civil rights (4 major American Churches split over the issue of slavery, forming northern and southern factions, including:

The Methodist Church: In 1861, the North Carolina Christian Advocate wrote of "the demon spirit of abolitionism" and how Southern Methodists had "tested it fully, and found it to be heartless, inhuman and Christless." Although the two factions reunited in 1939 as the Methodist Church, they retained racial segregation.

The country's Presbyterian Church also split into two.

The Baptist Church: The Southern Baptists are the largest and most reactionary christian denomination in the USA. They split away from the Baptists in 1845 over slavery, because they thought that slavery was okay. After the civil war, some Southern Baptists founded the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1960s, the Southern Baptists supported segregation laws and opposed the black civil rights movement. In 1995, the Southern Baptist Convention issued an apology to all African-Americans and asked for their forgiveness.
)


Local and regional: Go Argonauts?, the Feds are investigating the Santa Rosa County good ol' boy network, we first discussed this local Republi-Con corruption scandal, is it fraud, waste or abuse at the Studer Park, it back, oil that is, discovered floating near Deepwater Horizon well, God and local government, again,


Lance Cpl. Travis Nelson, R.I.P.;


National and international: I'm waiting, where's the balanced budget, don't hold you breath because the Republi-CONs Con the Tea Party, there'll be no $100 billion budget cut, and let's admit the obvious, the Republi-CONs are not serious about deficits, and who's responsible for the debt

Be Very Very Afraid of 'The Invisible [Republi-CON] Bond Vigilantes'

Republi-CON Want to Crucify the Middle Class 'Upon a Cross of Gold', Part of the Republi-CON War on the Middle Class

The Republi-CON stimulus myth

How About a Fake Alien Invasion Stimulus

Let's play the Republi-CON game of 'spot the contradiction', can you explain the Republi-CON contradiction as regards the economy, the debt ceiling, or deficits, or national security, or health care costs, or or even jobs

The myth of expansionary austerity

Told ya so: economic stimulus

Republi-CON tax hypocrisy

Beware federal pensioners, your day of reckoning is coming

The Great Stagnation' and our broken political system;


What Next in Libya?


150 years later


And the Republi-CON Race is On,

Still Searching for the Ideal Republican Candidate: Conservative, Interested, Electable

President Sexpot?

More premarital sex and another shotgun wedding for the Palin clan

Obama the One Term President, hell hath no fury like a liberal chumped again


A great write up on the bin Laden raid


1 to 1 in the COA, health care lawsuit update

The health care industry bottomline, the reason Republi-CON want to repeal the new health care law


The Republi-CON 'Climategate' myth


Believe it or not: DUI/DWI at the demolition derby

CSI dog poop,

Who you callin a Neanderthal

Giving new meaning to navel gazing,

Another Republi-CON myth buster, no the government isn't banning incandescent light bulbs

and

Big brother is watching you,


Fun stuff: My Mother's Wisdom

Best speeding excuse ever

A new test, are you Smart or Stoopid!

That's How the Fight Started

No kidding, an 'amazing' ad campaign featuring vaginal puppeteering

Doo Wop test

Twelve things that a motorcycle can teach, and cute little cats in 'It Could Be Worse';

and

Donate to a good cause: read "the story of a 9-year-old girl who teaches us adults about maturity truly renews our faith in humanity" at The New York Times, Rachel’s Last Fund-Raiser.

I'll discuss anything, but expect a no mercy take down if you are a shrieking hatemonger of right-wing rhetoric and partisan hackery, pandering to fear, anger and hatred, because the truth sure makes it hard out there for the party pimps.

So tune-in, call-in, but only if you can handle the truth and some ass kickin' discussion of politics and current events.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

The Republi-CON 'Climategate' Myth

"The National Science Foundation has found no evidence of research misconduct by Michael Mann, the Pennsylvania State University climatologist who has faced waves of attacks from foes of action to curb greenhouse gases." Read The New York Times, Federal Inquiry Is Latest to Clear Assailed Climate Scientist.

You may recall "that last year Fox News ran a breathless 'exclusive' about the National Science Foundation unleashing its Inspector General to investigate potential impropriety by Michael Mann, the Pennsylvania State University climatologist who for years has been a target of foes of restricting greenhouse gases.

According to the Fox reporter, Ed Barnes, such an investigation 'will be the first time that climate studies here will be scrutinized by an independent government organization with the skill and tools to investigate effectively.'

Now that the results of this landmark investigation are out, one would think that a 'fair and balanced' news outlet would be obliged to cover the outcome? Or not…
"

Maybe after Hedgehog News issues a correction, they can tell us what happens to 35 gigatons of CO2 each year.

I wouldn't hold my breath though.

God and Local Government

"The American Civil Liberites Union last week called into question the City of Milton’s sponsorship of the Santa Rosa County God and Country Rally." Read the Santa Rosa Press Gazette, ACLU challenges Milton's sponsorship of God and Country Rally. [Spelling incorrect in original.]

The rally is meant to distract the locals from an ongoing federal investigation of the Santa Rosa County good ol' boy network.

Still Searching for the Ideal Republican Candidate: Conservative, Interested, Electable

UPDATE IV: "If the Republican presidential candidates fail to offer substance, it's because they're giving the public what it wants -- empty calories." Read The Atlantic, Gluttons for Punishment: Blame Voters for the Dismal GOP Field, which notes:

"So if those GOP debates have reeked of rhetorical homogeneity, he suggests, maybe it's because the campaigns have been hearing the same things in their focus groups and polling of, yes, real people.

As with all-you-can-eat buffets, the political system has long ago seen the utility of producing and consuming empty political calories."


UPDATE III: With campaign promises like $2 a gallon gas, even one of the the Republican presidential candidates knows that "two of his major rivals were 'extreme' and 'unrealistic.'" Read The New York Times, Huntsman Calls His Rivals `Unelectable'.


UPDATE II: "You call tell how unhappy Republicans are by reading the Wall Street Journal editorial page, the one-stop shop for conservative orthodoxy. It fretted on Monday that Republicans and independents are 'desperate' for a unifying candidate, and that if 'the current field isn’t up to that, perhaps someone still off the field will step in and run.'" Read the Washington Post, The GOP’s summer of discontent.


UPDATE: Is he the one?:



"The entire campaign has been about the Republican Party searching for a candidate who is (a) capable of running a strong race against Barack Obama, (b) reliably conservative, and (c) actually interested in running." Read The New York Times, Pondering Perry’s Electability, which sums it up with this graph:


Tuesday, August 23, 2011

For the Canadian Readers

From a Canadian cousin, subject: Only in Newfoundland!:

Two Newfoundlanders were looking at a Sears catalogue and admiring the models.

One says to the other, 'Have you seen the beautiful girls in this catalogue?'

The second one replies, 'Yes, they are very beautiful.. And look at the price!'

The first one says, with wide eyes, 'Wow, they aren't very expensive. At this price, I'm buying one.'

The second Newfie smiles and pats him on the back. 'Good idea! Order one and if she's as beautiful as she is in the catalogue, I will get one too.'

Three weeks later, the one Newfie asks his friend, 'Did you ever receive the girl you ordered from the Sears catalogue?'

The second Newfie replies......

'No, but it shouldn't be long now. I got her clothes yesterday!'

Monday, August 22, 2011

Republi-CON Want to Crucify the Middle Class 'Upon a Cross of Gold', Part of the Republi-CON War on the Middle Class

UPDATE: Until recently, a "bargain — which emerged in stages between the 1890s and 1930s — established an institutional framework to balance the needs of the American people with the vast inequalities of wealth and power wrought by the triumph of industrial capitalism. It originated in the widespread apprehension that the rapidly growing power of robber barons, national corporations and banks (like J.P. Morgan’s) was undermining fundamental American values and threatening democracy. . .

The terms were straightforward if not systematically articulated. Capitalism would endure, as would almost all large corporations. Huge railroads, banks and other enterprises — with a few exceptions — would cease to be threatened with nationalization or breakup. Moreover, the state would service and promote private business.

In exchange, the federal government adopted a series of far-reaching reforms to shield and empower citizens, safeguarding society’s democratic character. First came the regulation of business and banking to protect consumers, limit the power of individual corporations and prevent anti-competitive practices. . .

The second prong of reform was guaranteeing workers’ right to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. The core premise of the 1914 Clayton Act and the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 — born of decades of experience — was that individual workers lacked the power to protect their interests when dealing with large employers. For the most poorly paid, the federal government mandated a minimum wage and maximum hours.

The third ingredient was social insurance. Unemployment insurance (1935), Social Security (1935), and, later, Medicaid and Medicare (1965) were grounded in the recognition that citizens could not always be self-sufficient and that it was the role of government to aid those unable to fend for themselves. The unemployment-insurance program left unrestrained employers’ ability to lay off workers but recognized that those who were jobless through no fault of their own (a common occurrence in a market economy) ought to receive public support.

Read the Washington Post, The real grand bargain, coming undone.

"Gov. Rick Perry of Texas said earlier this week, referring to Mr. Bernanke: 'If this guy prints more money between now and the election, I don’t know what y’all would do to him in Iowa but we would treat him pretty ugly down in Texas. Printing more money to play politics at this particular time in American history is almost treacherous — er, treasonous, in my opinion.'

In the 19th century the agricultural sector, particularly in the West, favored higher prices and effectively looser monetary policy. This was the background for William Jennings Bryan’s famous 'Cross of Gold' speech in 1896; the 'gold' to which he referred was the gold standard, the bastion of hard money — and tendency toward deflation — favored by the East Coast financial establishment." [Cross of Gold link changed.]

Read The New York Times, A Second Great Depression, or Worse?

All part of the Republi-CON war on the middle class!

As I stated before, the Naive-ocrats have been too stupid to call the bluff -- give the public what it claims it wants until they don't want it anymore.