The Obamney campaign was asked "to substantiate their claim that his policies will create 12 million jobs during his first term. The results were, as the kids say, LOL-worthy.
One study said a Romney-like tax plan could create 7 million jobs. The only problem? That was over 10 years, not four years. Worse, the study assumed that a Romney-like tax plan would be completely paid for and would happen in an economy at full employment. Neither is likely.
The next study was a Citigroup Global Markets effort that projected 3 million energy-related jobs. The only problems? It was over eight years, not four. Oh, and it wasn’t evaluating any of Romney’s policies at all. It was actually looking at current trends and policies — which is to say, Obama’s policies.
Then there’s the 2 million jobs that a 2011 International Trade Commission report estimated we could create if China stopped violating our intellectual property rights. This study wasn’t looking at either Obama or Romney’s policies, and no one thinks that any U.S. president could get Chinese businesses to respect American patents.
So Romney’s claim of 12 million jobs over four years breaks down to 7 million jobs over 10 years in an economy that’s already at full employment, 3 million jobs over eight years that have nothing to do with any of Romney’s policies, and 2 million jobs if China suddenly became very, very respectful of U.S. intellectual property laws."
Read the Washington Post, The Romney campaign’s job math is just as bad as its tax math.
"[T]he true Romney plan is to create an economic boom through the sheer
power of Mr. Romney’s personal awesomeness. But the campaign doesn’t
dare say that, for fear that voters would (rightly) consider it
ridiculous. So what we’re getting instead is an attempt to brazen it out
with nakedly false claims. There’s no jobs plan; just a plan for a snow
job on the American people"
Read The New York Times, Snow Job on Jobs.
Friday, October 19, 2012
More of Those Republi-CON and So-Call Christian Family Values
"Conservative pundit Dinesh D’Souza was forced to quit as president of an evangelical Christian college in Manhattan after it came to light that he became engaged to a young woman while he was still married.
D’Souza, 51, had brought his 29-year-old fiancĂ©e to a religious conference, and they shared a hotel room.
His resignation from The King’s College was announced Thursday by Andy Mills, chairman of the institution’s board of trustees.
A former Ronald Reagan aide, D’Souza is a best-selling conservative author and director of the controversial documentary “2016: Obama’s America” — which cast a critical eye at the President’s upbringing and early influences."
Read the New York Daily News, Conservative pundit Dinesh D'Souza steps down from Manhattan evangelical Christian college after unholy tryst.
I guess his CONservative success went to his head (the little one that is).
D’Souza, 51, had brought his 29-year-old fiancĂ©e to a religious conference, and they shared a hotel room.
His resignation from The King’s College was announced Thursday by Andy Mills, chairman of the institution’s board of trustees.
A former Ronald Reagan aide, D’Souza is a best-selling conservative author and director of the controversial documentary “2016: Obama’s America” — which cast a critical eye at the President’s upbringing and early influences."
Read the New York Daily News, Conservative pundit Dinesh D'Souza steps down from Manhattan evangelical Christian college after unholy tryst.
I guess his CONservative success went to his head (the little one that is).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)